BEWARE!!! Alcohol and Energy Drinks A Dangerous Combo, Study Says
Researchers
have published a study that shows college students combining
caffeinated drinks with booze don’t realize how intoxicated they really
are.
In a study published in
the Journal of Adolescent Health, researchers at the Institute for
Social Research at the University of Michigan have concluded that mixing
alcohol and energy drinks poses a serious public health risk,
especially among college students. "We found that college students
tended to drink more heavily, become more intoxicated, and have more
negative drinking consequences on days they used both energy drinks and
alcohol, compared to days they only used alcohol," said Megan Patrick, a
research assistant professor and co-author of the study.
According to the study,
students who either drank alcohol and energy drinks on the same day or
who combined the two at the same time wound up spending more time
drinking – thus consuming more alcohol – than they would have without
the caffeinated drinks. The result of spending more hours drinking
raised users' blood alcohol levels to higher peaks. But because of the
stimulant effects of the energy drinks, the users reported that they
felt less drunk than they actually were. "This can have serious
potential health impacts, for example if people don't realize how
intoxicated they actually are and decide to drive home," Patrick said.
But a similar study
conducted by the Department of Community Health at the Boston University
School of Public Health found that it wasn’t necessarily the
combination of alcohol and caffeine that posed a risk, but the profile
of the drinkers themselves that led to negative consequences. "It
appears that the consumption of caffeinated alcoholic beverages has a
direct effect on increasing risk by masking intoxication and making it
easier for youth to consume more alcohol,” said Dr. Michael Siegel, one
of the authors of the Boston University’s study. “It also appears that
consumption of alcohol with caffeine may itself be a marker for youth
who engage in riskier behavior.”
Are Alcoholic Energy Drinks Bad For Your Health?
One Editorial Says Research Could Be Downplaying The Effects
Four Loko, one of 2010’s
most popular alcoholic energy drinks may be without caffeine now, but
people can still make vodka Red Bull, Jager bombs (Jagermeister and Red
bull), and Crunk Juice (cognac and Red Bull), among other things. In a
recent editorial in BMJ,
Peter Miller, a professor of psychology, writes that research into the
health effects of these drinks hasn’t done enough to consider the “real
world levels of consumption,” and that the effects could be downplayed
because of industry-funded studies.
Are Energy Drink Companies Downplaying Health Effects?
“Epidemiological studies
show that drinkers who consume energy drinks are more likely to record a
higher breath alcohol concentration than those who do not,” Miller wrote in the article.
“They are also more likely to report drinking more alcohol, engaging in
aggressive acts, being injured; symptoms of alcohol dependence; having
driven while drunk or been a passenger in a car with an alcohol impaired
driver; and having taken sexual advantage of, or having been taken
advantage of by another person.”
Energy drinks, alone, have been shown to disturb heart rhythm and increase blood pressure. When consumed with alcohol, it’s believed that drinkers are less likely to feel drunk,
and therefore, they will continue to drink. However, most studies on
the subject focus more on the aftereffects and less on the actual
effects on the person as they drink.
One 2011 study asked
participants, who were split into four groups — energy drink,
energy/alcohol drink, alcohol drink, and placebo drink — to rate how
they felt with regards to stimulation, sedation, impairment, and levels
of intoxication, found that energy drinks altered the participants’
reactions to the alcohol, when compared to those who had only alcohol.
The participants were also measured on how quickly they were able to
suppress and execute actions after drinking.
“A consumer of alcohol,
with or without the energy drink, acts impulsively compared to when they
had not consumed alcohol,” Cecile Marczinski, assistant professor of
psychology at Northern Kentucky University and author of the study said
in a statement. “However, the consumer of the alcohol/energy drink felt
more stimulated compared to an alcohol-alone consumer. Therefore,
consumption of an energy drink combined with alcohol sets up a risky
scenario for the drinker due to this enhanced feeling of stimulation and
high impulsivity levels.”
Marczinski’s study,
however, is one of the few that concludes that alcohol and energy drinks
are a dangerous combination. Many researchers who have researched the
health effects of alcoholic energy drinks were funded by energy drink
makers, such as Red Bull, Miller says. And when they report at
conferences, they aren’t always required to disclose conflicts of
interest, leading to a biased report.
At the 2012 Australian
Professional Society on Alcohol and Drugs Conference, four of the five
researchers that reported on the correlation between alcohol and energy
drinks said there was no evidence to suggest that both drinks together
caused more drinking or harm. They were also the four sponsored by Red
Bull. The sole researcher who didn’t have a conflict of interest,
although agreeing that there wasn’t a significant difference in using
the two together, also admitted that there just wasn’t enough evidence
to conclusively answer the key questions yet.
Miller says that all of
the researchers’ most notable study limitations were that none of them
had a substantial amount of research into the effects of real world
levels of alcohol intoxication — about 0.1mg of alcohol per 100ml of
blood — when consumed with energy drinks (about two to five drinks).
“It is critical that the
public can be confident in the findings of research on these products,”
Miller concluded. “Conference organizers and journal editors should
require researchers working on energy drinks to declare whether they
have received research funding [or other conflicts of interest].”